|
|
|
|
Well after watching the disappointing football
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #364
Scotland fans would definitely win a personality contest. Just a shame their team can't string any decent moves together.
|
|
|
|
|
Never mind Scotland one day you will make it to the knockout stages, but not in my lifetime though.
|
|
|
|
Shame about Scotland I would've like to have seen them go through.
If their players were as good as their fans they would've topped their group.
|
|
|
|
Great news Alan hansen seems to be on the mend .
Come on Scotland
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #349
sir Alex or pep doing that!
Nope, that’s what they need when the are playing like that, some hairdryer 
I read Southgate has a leadership team, Kane, Bellingham and a couple more, if this is the case then it tells your about their mentality and thinking. Tactically we got pressured and folded and did not have a plan B or C. I worry 
He needs to get on the touchline and tell them how it is ffs
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #360
Var has been very swift overall, a great improvement, I like that snickometer thing too.
If it can be kept as swift I'd like it to be used when the ref makes a clear and obvious error in all instances, there have been a fair few wrong everything's, throw ins, free kick, a card and corners.
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #359
Totally agree atwell is a ****
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #357
I think VAR should be used this way...........
If the ref has made a clear and obvious mistake then VAR should overrule it. That shouldn't take long to do.
If it's going to ages then it can't be clear and obvious mistake and so the refs decision is used.
I haven't watched all the matches but from what I can gather VAR decisions have been swift.
In this instance I wonder how long it would've taken if the refs weren't British?
|
|
|
|
The Netherlands were robbed and that ref was biased, as for the TV commentary you'd think the French were playing each other 
Not sure if you guys saw it but on one of the replays as the ball came past the defender both the goalies feet were off the ground. How can his dive be impeded if he physically can't dive, hence just watching it. Any goalie worth there salt would have dived if they could, player there or not 
So now all goalies will just stand there when a opposing player is in a offside position, not interfering with play and the ref will side with them, great precedent being set there.
TBF, the refs and var have been pretty good up until then, trust the U.K unit to bring it into Q again!
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #356
Cobblers.
The only person impeding the keeper was his team mate stood Infront of him causing him to see the ball late then blame Dumfries. If it was 'offside' then why take so long to come up with that decision? I will agree with the commentators, they are now using VAR to deliberately scratch off goals, it's not being used for its intended purpose. GOAL!
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #354
Dissagree. It was offside. Dumphries was in an offside position and impeded the keepers ability to attempt to play the ball (dive for it). Regardless of whether anyone thinks it was saveable or not..... he was stood where the keeper would have to dive to make an attempt to save it. As much as everyone wanted the dutch to win.....it was offside.
|
|
| | | mal | | Posts: 8986 |  | |
|
In reply to Post #353
Taylor and Atwell realised that a Liverpool player was involved in the build up
No goal...
Heard a rumour that Olise has signed for Bayern. Great move for him if its true. I would've liked him at anfield though
|
|
|
|
|
NON Carp stuff