|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1235
one of mine...
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1229
It’s all done by mirrors with a lot of help with Adobe Bridge If you have Photoshop and open an image in Bridge you can get a lot of information which is imbedded in the photograph. For instance the sausage shot was taken at 1/640@5.6
|
|
| | | ev | | Posts: 1041 |  | |
|
In reply to Post #1233
no mate its all in the picture !!! EXIF data tells a million stories 
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1232
indeed.. something tells me i've mentioned my gear at some point 
|
|
| | | ev | | Posts: 1041 | | |
|
In reply to Post #1231
ahhh thats magic!!!  500d i think?
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1230
Cheers mate, yeh that's right, how did you know what lens that was with??
|
|
| | | ev | | Posts: 1041 | | |
|
In reply to Post #1229
nice shots neil
250 mm canon zoom?? like the flame licked bangers !!
|
|
|
|
Got a handful from todays' bbq with the family..
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1227
Hi Mate
Bluebells too low to the ground for me. They are difficult to photograph, try getting your focus point on the nearest flower and use a small aperture to get the maximum depth of field which will help to get the others sharper or focus on the nearest one and use a large aperture(bigger opening) so that the ones behind are totally out. You have prompted me to have a go, we have some white ones, can you get white bluebells.
Apparently you can Hyacinthoides hispanica white, syn. Scilla campanulata
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1225
|
|
|
|
|
I have GOT to get myself a decent macro lens!!
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1223
no ev mushrooms in my garden
|
|
| | | ev | | Posts: 1041 | | |
|
In reply to Post #1223
Puff balls Peter?
Is the image upside-down ??
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1208
|
|
| | | ev | | Posts: 1041 | | |
|
In reply to Post #1221
Well I have not been in my darkroom for years now, just sold my 6x6 gear and film processor
And totally agree with workflow back then, one of my heroes is still using kodak ir film even though it's not made anymore he has loads in his freezer !!!
The amount of dodging and burning that goes into his work is mind blowing and if you have any time in a darkroom you will understand why
I rarely use Photoshop to change any aspect of the image all my work is done through aperture and I find it gives me the results I like with less hassle
Don't get me wrong I like Photoshop too but I feel it has it's place slot of peole can overdo what's needed and the image seen at point of pressing the shutter is not what you get at the end of the process
Each to their own I find , as for taking the same shots of the same objects and monuments
All it takes is a little thought to be different and digital is great for this as you can see what you get and make a change accordingly till you get the result you want
I have a few ideas myself on a few places but still in the planning stages
|
|
