|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1317
those are the ones they learn from
I would swear, suffice to say fornicate learning, I've had enough of that rammed down my throat to last me a life time as a Man U fan, enough...just enough  
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1315
That’s Nuno Santos tactics, stops you playing, chases and closes everything down and counters.
Can’t be a top class performance any game, those are the ones they learn from. We had a couple of decent chances too.
As you mention though BF too deep prefer him up there behind Mbeumo for me, and Cunha as super sub
|
|
| | | Cam | | Posts: 6661 |  | | MODERATOR | |
|
In reply to Post #1315
I flicked between the two, (CHE v LEE, WHU v MAN).
Just your typical Leeds comeback on the first game, Chelsea should have won it at the end.
First half of the West Ham game was awful, not surprised you turned it off at half-time.
Second half was totally different, West Ham just set-up right and a tad unlucky not to take the 3 points.
Both results good for us IF we pick up 3 points tonight.
|
|
|
|
IManagers don't seem to be able to see what's in front of them at times, they could do with a independent pov who gets on the phone and says..oi...it's not working fcs, change it.
If they don't they should have to explain themselves to their manager just like any person or manager in real life.
I switched off at half time, Utd had no one in the box most of the time, just running like headless chickens up the pitch into the corner then side side back ala VG. Amad kept coming in from the right giving them zero width and options and Bueno was far too deep, at about 25 mins I actually asked the Mrs if he was playing.
To me they looked tired and out of ideas and the aversion to crossing a ball (weekend game)..why. Has the Carrick effect warn off? Sticking with the same team too long?...or did I miss something and were West Ham a threat worth playing so deeply for...hmm
Edit, should've watched the Leeds game, come on Brighton tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
| | | Cam | | Posts: 6661 | | | MODERATOR | |
|
In reply to Post #1312
Well, we've been consistently poor 
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1310
One word, inconsistent
Sloppy which I shouldn’t complain abou
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1309
To be fair I though it was a near on 50/50 but if I had been having a bet it would have been in City, title race.
I would have deffo preferred the drawn
|
|
|
|
|
I can’t see Liverpool finishing in the top 6 tbh they just can’t defend….
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1308
Bloody Scousegits let me down 
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1307
City are a great footballing side I’m afraid to say, credit to PG
That was a breaker for both teams considering where they are for me
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1306
Win for city me thinks and Haaland to break his duck.
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1305
Massive game for City and the Scoucers today!
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1304
Yes 2 nil and they fecked it up.
Bit like the 119ers.
Almost like Manure until their Fergie time goal
Well done Brentford
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #1303
Think they were two up!
Good game of football today, What a winner, another wonder goal
|
|
NON Carp stuff