|
|
|
|
 #1986 25 Jan 2021 at 7.49am | |   |
|
In reply to Post #1983
You can hate anybody that voted to leave Europe if it negatively affected you, but they didn’t have a right to vote that way if it was negatively affecting them? That doesn’t even make sense. And isn’t what I said. If you voted leave and your business is ruined and you’ve lost you have gone bankrupt or whatever financial hole you’ve been left in, then you voted for it so it’s your own doing. Using the brexit example.
If you lose your business, house, etc. Because of something someone else voted for to happen to you, you would have every right to hate those people, because they destroyed your life... it doesn’t often happen because you know singularly that one person didn’t cause it, it was a collective of people that did. Also people have the understanding that political votes are selfish and based on what best for yourself/your business/family.
|
|
|
|
|
#1985 25 Jan 2021 at 7.49am | | |
|
In reply to Post #1984
I think , as with me the "hate " is temporary , i think some of our focus should be , who made these people electable , knowing how corrupt and incompetent they were and they did !
Our press and media , as i said previously , the honest man was made unelectable and the lying corrupt buffoon made electable !
And we are where we are today !
Think about it ! 
|
|
|
|
|
#1984 25 Jan 2021 at 6.31am | | |
|
In reply to Post #1982
Morning. No 
|
|
| | | noj | | Posts: 9997 |  | | Social photographer... | |
|
|
#1983 24 Jan 2021 at 11.16pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1980
You can hate anybody that voted to leave Europe if it negatively affected you, but they didn’t have a right to vote that way if it was negatively affecting them?
Bit of education and understanding is often the answer, not hating people
|
|
|
|
|
#1982 24 Jan 2021 at 10.54pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1981
You're not taking this too seriously then?
|
|
|
|
|
#1981 24 Jan 2021 at 9.44pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1980
I’m off to bed 
|
|
|
|
|
#1980 24 Jan 2021 at 7.50pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1977
I’d say considering politics can be controlled by the public, i.e. a democracy, in a properly functioning society anyway, that it’s not the worst thing humans have an ingrained hatred towards each other over. Religion, football team. Otters, race, etc.
Some far more trivial, some out of anyone’s control, some based on no facts. At least with politics you are meant to have some form of control being the employer of the politicians.
Some have the right to hate you over your political vote, if it directly affects them in a negative way. For instance if your business went out of business due to brexit then you can hate everyone that voted leave, only if you were a remainer. Or if your business rates went up and you couldn’t survive as was a Labour proposal in their manifesto.
I hate racists, so I have every right to hate towards Boris Johnson.
|
|
|
|
|
#1979 24 Jan 2021 at 7.48pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1978
That hat was only ever for effect......
|
|
| | | mal | | Posts: 6099 |  | |
|
|
#1978 24 Jan 2021 at 7.45pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1976
yeah - I agree she's got more testicles than the rest of the cabinet together (although it's not difficult is it - Gove? Williamson? Hancock? Rees - feckin Mogg? ffs  - my cat would have that lot for breakfast and not break a sweat)
It sounds like what you're saying is that we need a new Thatcher...  (throws grenade and waits for impact)
and I don't do patronising.
now run along and play with your fishy friends... just don't let that wayne boy anywhere near the kitchen foil again
|
|
|
|
|
#1977 24 Jan 2021 at 7.31pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1970
All this goes to show the problem with politics.. It’s just an ingrained hatred of people because of their rosette colour
So true 
|
|
| | | noj | | Posts: 9997 | | | Social photographer... | |
|
|
#1976 24 Jan 2021 at 7.26pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1973
That’s why I stated she’s a **** and I’m not endorsing her mate.
I’m sure you know what I’m getting at without being annoying of patronising in return
|
|
|
|
|
#1975 24 Jan 2021 at 7.15pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1969
You been on the shandy Jonny...... 
|
|
|
|
|
#1974 24 Jan 2021 at 7.13pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1972
So your hypothetical situations have conclusions that you have created but it’s factual? Yeah okay then.
Maybe you should put a qwayne disclaimer on it to mention it could be true, could not be, you could mean it but you might not so no one should believe you.
And let’s face it, priti Patel reckons she told boris to shut the borders in March last year. Clearly got no balls because she seemed to roll over and not fight for that to happen, in the slightest, at all, ever. That’s if you believe anything she says of course. Bit like qwayne.
|
|
| | | mal | | Posts: 6099 | | |
|
|
#1973 24 Jan 2021 at 7.05pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1972
careful what you wish for noj... priti is a nasty piece of work. we'd be in George Orwell territory with her in charge
|
|
| | | noj | | Posts: 9997 | | | Social photographer... | |
|
|
#1972 24 Jan 2021 at 7.00pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1971
JC doesn’t have the charisma or authority so people wouldn’t have listened and he hasn’t got the minerals to put the country into lockdown by force.
Priti Patel is by all accounts a ****, but she’d have locked us down before we could say where’s all the toilet rolls gone.
That’s not an endorsement for her or her party over anyone else, just stating she has more ******** than both men mentioned like Jacinda Arden does
|
|
