|
|
|
|
 #322 5 Jan 2013 at 8.07pm | |   |
|
In reply to Post #320
cheers for that . but would that leave me minus 2'5 per cent so if that's the case what could I up the missing . 25 per cent on 
|
|
|
|
|
#321 5 Jan 2013 at 2.53pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #320
Would the real Ken Townley please stand up.... 
|
|
|
|
|
#320 5 Jan 2013 at 2.48pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #319
I know I am not Ken but 2.5% selenavite e is ideal
|
|
|
|
|
#319 5 Jan 2013 at 2.20pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #77
afternoon ken 
i was just wondering on the bm1 can i change the equivite for selenavite e if i can would it still be at 5%
cheers kevin
|
|
|
|
|
#318 1 Jan 2013 at 6.08pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #317
Out of interest what liquids did you add?
|
|
|
|
|
#317 1 Jan 2013 at 3.46pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #77
made my first batch of the said recipe today, cost me £2.66 kg including eggs and flavours, bought 100kg of dry ingrediants, cheap as chips bring on the spring
|
|
|
|
|
#316 18 Dec 2012 at 10.33pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #315
Thanks Sam......tells me just what I needed to know 
|
|
|
|
|
#315 18 Dec 2012 at 9.56pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #314
OK what I meant was I would rather get my protein content from high BV ingredients apposed to things like soya flour and supergold 60.
Supergold 60/ prairie meal is supposed to have a high bv, and maybe it has for cattle etc, but for carp? I just don't agree with it.
I would rather balance aa profile with things such as higher levels of cpsp90, krill, wpc80, other refined milks, spirulina, high grade liver powder etc etc. No doubt someone will claim that refined milks are not digestible but it is my opinion that they are.
Just my opinion of coarse 
You originally said- .....I'm asking for an example of the type of ingredients
But you then said you weren't asking for the ingredients
You also said- I'm not asking you to post up details of your mixes
I am confused but maybe that's the festive drinks! Hopefully I have told you all you needed to know
|
|
|
|
|
#314 18 Dec 2012 at 9.43pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #313
Don't be so defensive Sam - Im sure nobody thinks you are knocking Peter's mix. I understand what biological value is thanks so can give google a miss on that.
I'm not asking what ingredients have a high biological value. You said in your earlier post that you would prefer a bait with lower crude protein levels but a higher biological value..... I'm simply asking you for an example of such a bait, as it's your stated preference.....can you give one?
|
|
|
|
|
#313 18 Dec 2012 at 9.13pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #312
Should have known I was opening up myself for this!
I certainly did not critisise smurf or his mix, think I made that clear and praised him for posting it up.
Are you asking what ingredients have high biological value? Do a search!
|
|
|
|
|
#312 18 Dec 2012 at 9.06pm | | |
|
|
To be fair on Sam, it is much easier to criticise others efforts than it is to open yourself up for the same criticism
|
|
|
|
|
#311 18 Dec 2012 at 7.30pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #310
And if you read my post Sam I'm not asking you to post up details of your mixes.....I'm asking for an example of the type of ingredients/mix you describe.....doesn't have to be one of your secret mixes
|
|
|
|
|
#310 18 Dec 2012 at 4.40pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #308
If you re read my post, you will see that I am not willing to post any of my mixes up.
Why should I? I have worked hard to get the mixes how I want them, why shouldn't others?
|
|
|
|
|
#309 18 Dec 2012 at 4.39pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #307
You are not rubbing me up the wrong way at all  Just felt your post deserved a response
|
|
|
|
|
#308 18 Dec 2012 at 4.32pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #307
I would favour a lower protein bait that has high BV where non of the protein is wasted and amply meets the carps aa requirement. Such a mix would obviously cost more money
Give us an example Sam
|
|
