|
|
|
|
 #1702 8 May 2012 at 4.44pm | |   |
|
In reply to Post #1000
|
|
|
|
|
#1701 7 May 2012 at 8.57pm | | |
|
A few weeks ago I bought £39 Groupon deal for a whole day of studio tuition.Here are a few of the results......
|
|
|
|
|
#1700 7 May 2012 at 8.56am | | |
|
In reply to Post #1699
Thats cool 
|
|
|
|
|
#1699 6 May 2012 at 9.12pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1000
taken using panasonic g3 and 45/200 zoom. at 51mm F4 1/1000 shutter priority iso 1600
it was quite dark in a little courtyard. waht sun there was happened to be at the other side of the house. Robin is wild
but takes food from the hand.T
|
|
|
|
|
#1698 6 May 2012 at 6.29pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1697
  width=500>
Taken with a EOS 450D, fitted with a Canon 50mm f1.8 FD lens (old type) a Lens Doctor FD/EOS adapter and 2 extension tubes.
Hi Neil
I understand your predicament. I have a number of shots taken with a standard lens (the Canon FD 50mm f1.8 teamed up with a couple of extension tubes) on FlickR. Have a look, my address is JohnT2012.
If you are looking to add tubes to a Canon electric lens then you will need a set of auto extension tubes because you can’t manually stop down the aperture on a auto focus lens.
The price of a Canon set is expensive, the cheapest non Canon set I have seen on the bay were around £50 which is very cheap for this type of thing.
Using non auto focus lenses with manual tubes on a EOS camera is a bit more difficult than the auto focus verity but you can do it at a fraction of the cost. Excluding the cost of the adapter, which is shared amongst other lenses, the lens and tubes cost me around £30 in total. You do have the benefit of `old glass` which is as good as if not better than the modern equivalents in many cases
If I was looking for something quick to use and did not want to spend £700 on a Canon then the Sigma and Tamron lenses are very good.
|
|
|
|
|
#1697 6 May 2012 at 3.02pm | | |
|
|
I'm really wanting to have a go at a bit of macro photography, but can't really afford a new lens at the moment after buying a Canon EF-S 18-105. (I know it's not a massively expensive or brilliant lens,but it's quite a lot for my standard of photography!) I know that you can buy extender tubes to increase the distance between the lens and the sensor but how effective would that be with my lens? I don't want to waste money only to find out that I should have bought a macro lens! So, cheap macro lens or extender tubes??
|
|
|
|
|
#1696 6 May 2012 at 9.54am | | |
|
In reply to Post #1695
Nice shot tufty 
Great to be on the bank witnessing nature at its best
|
|
|
|
|
#1695 5 May 2012 at 10.13pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1694
|
|
|
|
|
#1694 3 May 2012 at 6.00pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1693
Thanks again Pete
|
|
|
|
|
#1693 2 May 2012 at 10.06pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1692
Once again dave some real good shots
|
|
|
|
|
#1692 2 May 2012 at 6.35pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1691
Thanks Pete Been Taking a few Close-ups with my 105 today
|
|
|
|
|
#1691 1 May 2012 at 12.33pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1684
Neal i love the starlight shot although there all good but that really appeals to my self
|
|
|
|
|
#1690 1 May 2012 at 12.30pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1689
Lovely shots dave especaly the moon very clear
|
|
|
|
|
#1689 30 Apr 2012 at 9.00pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1688
Nice shots tufty.
Use Flickr for better quality Neil
|
|
|
|
|
#1688 28 Apr 2012 at 9.20pm | | |
|
In reply to Post #1687
|
|
