|
|
|
|
 #194 20 Feb 2011 at 9.06pm | |  |   |
|
In reply to Post #193
Advice taken on board, and appreciated, however on this occasion I purposely shot those pictures in that way, for contrast and to attract attention to the parts in focus.
Cheers for your advice though!
|
|
|
|
|
#193 20 Feb 2011 at 8.58pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #191
Can I make a suggestion, when taking still life shots especially close ups it’s very important that you get the entire image in very sharp focus. What normally happens is that there is not always sufficient lighting to allow the camera to function on a small aperture ie f16 and below which gives you a good depth of field. You focus on a part of the object, which results in that part being in focus but other parts will be out of focus; this is one of the problems of close up photography.
A couple of ways around this. You can use additional lighting. Digital cameras are very tolerant of the types of lighting that can be used without causing a color cast over the image. Depending on the lights used you can get a blue to gold cast. Digital does not suffer as badly. You could use flash but at close up distances it tends to wash out the image. The easiest way is to use the smallest aperture you can get away with which will give you a longer exposure. This can be a problem because exposure will reach a point where camera shake will give a blurry image. A tripod and a remote control will allow you to use a longer time exposure with a small aperture which will give you a crisp image across all of the subject.
Not wishing to tell people how to suck eggs but I hope this helped.
|
|
|
|
|
#192 20 Feb 2011 at 3.31pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #1000
 a winters day
|
|
|
|
|
#191 20 Feb 2011 at 2.04pm | | | |
|
Few more from playing around the other day..
|
|
|
|
|
#190 16 Feb 2011 at 8.41pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #186
Can be a pain mate,this works. Using Photobucket click on the image to get a 60% enlargement. Right click on the photo, drop down menue select properties. Highlite the url Right click to copy.
On the site put in this
Important that you leave a space after img and at the end of the code you pasted
Hope that helped.
|
|
|
|
|
#189 16 Feb 2011 at 8.41pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #186
Can be a pain mate,this works. Using Photobucket click on the image to get a 60% enlargement. Right click on the photo, drop down menue select properties. Highlite the url Right click to copy.
On the site put in this
Important that you leave a space after img and at the end of the code you pasted
Hope that helped.
|
|
|
|
|
#188 16 Feb 2011 at 8.40pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #186
Can be a pain mate,this works. Using Photobucket click on the image to get a 60% enlargement. Right click on the photo, drop down menue select properties. Highlite the url Right click to copy.
On the site put in this
Important that you leave a space after img and at the end of the code you pasted
Hope that helped.
|
|
|
|
|
#187 16 Feb 2011 at 8.06pm | | | |
|
|
Message Suppressed by Forum Moderator.
|
|
|
|
|
#186 15 Feb 2011 at 2.48pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #185
I give up. Why cant this forum just accept direct IMG links.
|
|
|
|
|
#185 15 Feb 2011 at 2.47pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #184
Sorry still getting the hang of this
|
|
|
|
|
#184 15 Feb 2011 at 2.45pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #1000
A few from my (rather long in the tooth) 450D
IMG]http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd173/robfosters/IMG_1618-1.jpg[/IMG]
|
|
|
|
|
#183 8 Feb 2011 at 6.24pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #182
It's f4.5-5.6 mate. Also got a HSM and is OS. Apparently the OS is really good on that model.
|
|
|
|
|
#182 7 Feb 2011 at 10.26pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #181
Sigma have come on leaps and bounds in recent years and offer some great alternatives to `house brands` 120-400 that’s a combo I have not come across before. What’s the F no on that
|
|
|
|
|
#181 7 Feb 2011 at 6.39pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #180
They were all taken on the manual setting. Planning on getting a Sigma 120-400mm lens in the next few weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
#180 6 Feb 2011 at 10.50pm | | | |
|
In reply to Post #179
The 18-55mm lens is a very good lens. Very sharp on close up and just as good at the other end. Did you use the night shooting mode for some of these or was it a long exposure.
|
|
