|
|
#1380 6 Oct 2011 at 5.17pm | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1379 http://www.apple.com/uk/aperture/?cid=mc-uk-g-mac-m-ape-brand&sissr=1
Thanks 60s rules Aperture 3 is photo enhancing software from Apple, its a fairly good organiser and enhancing program though there are quite a few things you can't do that you can in photoshop or Gimp.
I still use my Gimp for further editing at times
|
|
|
#1379 6 Oct 2011 at 8.38am | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1378 Thanks David, That’s impressive, ISO 100, I would have put the house on you using a higher setting. Just goes to show what you can produce with a DSLR. Looking forward to having a look at some more of your work using the site addresses.
You mentioned using some aperture enhancing software, what programme would that be.
|
|
|
#1378 6 Oct 2011 at 5.22am | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1377 sorry
using AFS-35mm lens with D5000 in vivid mode f/13 1/125sec iso100 added a little enhancing in aperture software otherwise nearly as taken.
never could get the hang of putting links on here but you can check the exif on all my shots in my flickrhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/32791195@N08/
or google dangerousdavecarper
|
|
|
#1377 5 Oct 2011 at 11.01pm | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1376 The shot I was asking about is the shot with the rods, is that the one you are referring to or the moon shot
|
|
|
#1376 5 Oct 2011 at 9.15pm | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1375 Only used aperture priority on f/8 1/160sec -4/3EV iso200. it is surpising how much light you get off the moon
the sigma is sharper at f/8 than max aperture of f/6.3.
I added some sharpness contrast in aperture software
Taken handheld with a steady hand, the stabiliser did the rest
|
|
|
#1375 5 Oct 2011 at 7.26am | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1371 Out of interest what were you working with here. Looking at this image again it struck me how sharp the image is across the board. Given that I would have expected the lens to be opened up because of the lack of light, you seem to have nailed the exposure.
|
|
|
#1374 5 Oct 2011 at 5.21am | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1372 thanks, yes did see the weed didn't want two pick it off might disturb the fish lol.
Thanks mickey i did take several exposures using my sigma 500 handheld, super lens
|
|
|
#1373 4 Oct 2011 at 10.01pm | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1371 David ; that is a cracking picture of the moon
|
|
|
#1372 4 Oct 2011 at 9.54pm | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1371 Like the piece of weed hanging off the second rod, nice pics by the way
|
|
|
#1371 4 Oct 2011 at 6.25pm | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1370 heres a couple from sunday evening

|
|
|
#1370 2 Oct 2011 at 5.47pm | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1369 Nice shot of the side street with the sun setting
|
|
|
#1369 2 Oct 2011 at 2.06pm | |  |
|
|
|
#1368 30 Sept 2011 at 8.33pm | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1367 same here, can't get 105 quality with my 18-55.
will be splashing out soon
|
|
|
#1367 30 Sept 2011 at 8.29pm | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1364 Hi David, can’t take credit for the photo as I did not take it. I thought it was a funny shot, even funnier as I know the guy. He is a very talented occasion photographer and works a lot in the far East.
Have to agree with Peter, stunning shots. I must get a 100mm macro lens. Spent the afternoon in the garden and came away with some rubbish insect shots.
|
|
|
#1366 30 Sept 2011 at 8.27pm | |  |
|
In reply to Post #1365 Thanks petethecrip
|
|