|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #320
Would the real Ken Townley please stand up.... 
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #319
I know I am not Ken but 2.5% selenavite e is ideal
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #77
afternoon ken 
i was just wondering on the bm1 can i change the equivite for selenavite e if i can would it still be at 5%
cheers kevin
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #317
Out of interest what liquids did you add?
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #77
made my first batch of the said recipe today, cost me £2.66 kg including eggs and flavours, bought 100kg of dry ingrediants, cheap as chips bring on the spring
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #315
Thanks Sam......tells me just what I needed to know 
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #314
OK what I meant was I would rather get my protein content from high BV ingredients apposed to things like soya flour and supergold 60.
Supergold 60/ prairie meal is supposed to have a high bv, and maybe it has for cattle etc, but for carp? I just don't agree with it.
I would rather balance aa profile with things such as higher levels of cpsp90, krill, wpc80, other refined milks, spirulina, high grade liver powder etc etc. No doubt someone will claim that refined milks are not digestible but it is my opinion that they are.
Just my opinion of coarse 
You originally said- .....I'm asking for an example of the type of ingredients
But you then said you weren't asking for the ingredients
You also said- I'm not asking you to post up details of your mixes
I am confused but maybe that's the festive drinks! Hopefully I have told you all you needed to know
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #313
Don't be so defensive Sam - Im sure nobody thinks you are knocking Peter's mix. I understand what biological value is thanks so can give google a miss on that.
I'm not asking what ingredients have a high biological value. You said in your earlier post that you would prefer a bait with lower crude protein levels but a higher biological value..... I'm simply asking you for an example of such a bait, as it's your stated preference.....can you give one?
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #312
Should have known I was opening up myself for this!
I certainly did not critisise smurf or his mix, think I made that clear and praised him for posting it up.
Are you asking what ingredients have high biological value? Do a search!
|
|
|
|
|
To be fair on Sam, it is much easier to criticise others efforts than it is to open yourself up for the same criticism
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #310
And if you read my post Sam I'm not asking you to post up details of your mixes.....I'm asking for an example of the type of ingredients/mix you describe.....doesn't have to be one of your secret mixes
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #308
If you re read my post, you will see that I am not willing to post any of my mixes up.
Why should I? I have worked hard to get the mixes how I want them, why shouldn't others?
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #307
You are not rubbing me up the wrong way at all  Just felt your post deserved a response
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #307
I would favour a lower protein bait that has high BV where non of the protein is wasted and amply meets the carps aa requirement. Such a mix would obviously cost more money
Give us an example Sam
|
|
|
|
In reply to Post #306
Hi Smurf
I have a terrible habit of rubbing people up the wrong way, so I shall tread very carefully with this one!
That is what I meant to say, this is a cheapER mix, I should have said (I was basically saying I am sure you can come up with better)
It is high protein and yes not all of it is available- not quite what I would go for in winter.
Imo in winter it is even more important to not drain the carps system and to get it bob on.
I would favour a lower protein bait that has high BV where non of the protein is wasted and amply meets the carps aa requirement. Such a mix would obviously cost more money
It is very good of you to put a mix up, so please don't think I am slating you.
Would I put a lower protein/ high bv mix up? NO! So I guess that is all I have to say!
|
|
